W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Investigate ISSUE-2341 and look for previous comments

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:51:16 +0200
Message-ID: <1739929775.20100726175116@w3.org>
To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hello ,

ACTION-2818
Investigate ISSUE-2341 and look for previous comments

Continuing to follow the trail, there is some agreement from Dr. Olaf, some disagreement and it ends up at an action in the old (now frozen, member-only) tracker

ACTION~1942
Summarize the use of different list syntaxes and to suggest a unified list syntax that will be used mail the svg wg list
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Group/track/actions/1942

linked from a mail from Cameron
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0105.html


I notice that, apparently as a result of that earlier discussion,  SVGT1.2 has a clarifying section on Paced animation and complex types
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/animate.html#complexDistances

while 1.1 does not have that section. It would seem to make sense to port over that section, as it provides useful clarifying details.

-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 26 July 2010 15:51:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:12 UTC