W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Investigate ISSUE-2341 and look for previous comments

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:29:00 -0400
Message-ID: <4C50066C.9040307@w3.org>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hi, Chris-

We had previously decided not to tackle this in SVG 1.1, but to address
it in SVG 2.  Are you suggesting we reopen this for SVG 1.1?

Regards-
-Doug

Chris Lilley wrote (on 7/26/10 11:51 AM):
> Hello ,
>
> ACTION-2818 Investigate ISSUE-2341 and look for previous comments
>
> Continuing to follow the trail, there is some agreement from Dr.
> Olaf, some disagreement and it ends up at an action in the old (now
> frozen, member-only) tracker
>
> ACTION~1942 Summarize the use of different list syntaxes and to
> suggest a unified list syntax that will be used mail the svg wg list
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Group/track/actions/1942
>
> linked from a mail from Cameron
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0105.html
>
>
> I notice that, apparently as a result of that earlier discussion,
> SVGT1.2 has a clarifying section on Paced animation and complex
> types http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/animate.html#complexDistances
>
> while 1.1 does not have that section. It would seem to make sense to
> port over that section, as it provides useful clarifying details.
>
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2010 10:29:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:12 UTC