- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:29:00 -0400
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hi, Chris- We had previously decided not to tackle this in SVG 1.1, but to address it in SVG 2. Are you suggesting we reopen this for SVG 1.1? Regards- -Doug Chris Lilley wrote (on 7/26/10 11:51 AM): > Hello , > > ACTION-2818 Investigate ISSUE-2341 and look for previous comments > > Continuing to follow the trail, there is some agreement from Dr. > Olaf, some disagreement and it ends up at an action in the old (now > frozen, member-only) tracker > > ACTION~1942 Summarize the use of different list syntaxes and to > suggest a unified list syntax that will be used mail the svg wg list > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Group/track/actions/1942 > > linked from a mail from Cameron > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0105.html > > > I notice that, apparently as a result of that earlier discussion, > SVGT1.2 has a clarifying section on Paced animation and complex > types http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/animate.html#complexDistances > > while 1.1 does not have that section. It would seem to make sense to > port over that section, as it provides useful clarifying details. >
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2010 10:29:02 UTC