W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Browsers and ECMAscript editions

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:50:28 +0200
Message-ID: <599005219.20100712185028@w3.org>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Monday, July 12, 2010, 4:19:06 PM, Chris wrote:

CL> Hello,

CL> Mohamed has asked us to link to ECMAScript 5th Edition of
CL> December 2009. We aren't sure what edition is actually implemented
CL> in browsers, and other SVG implementors.

CL> Comments by implementors would help here.

Mozilla  seems to be proceeding with ECMAScript 5th edition (1.5)
https://developer.mozilla.org/En/JavaScript/ECMAScript_5_support_in_Mozilla

Webkit also
http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2010/01/15/ecmascript-5-and-webkitjavascriptcore/

Opera has partial support and 'will support it once finalized'
http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/presto25/#ecmascript

Its not clear whether Mozilla Rhino
http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/
and thus other engines which use Rhino, such as Batik
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/batik/using/scripting/ecmascript.html
are on ECMAScript 5.

A bugzilla bug indicates that it is requested, and may be underway
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=489326
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Rhino_Wish_List#Implement_ECMAScript_edition_5


CL> ISSUE-2344 
CL> ACTION-2821





-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 12 July 2010 16:50:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:12 UTC