W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: ISSUE-2344: Update references section [SVG 1.1 F2 Last Call]

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:22:28 +0200
Message-ID: <1871712896.20100712182228@w3.org>
To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
CC: SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Monday, July 12, 2010, 5:54:20 PM, Leonard wrote:

LR> On the ICC spec - the ICC and the ISO versions are technically
LR> equivalent but the ISO version uses correct/proper ISO terminology
LR> and is thus a better normative reference.  It's similar to the way
LR> PDF 1.7 vs. ISO 32000-1 relate.  So there is nothing wrong with
LR> using the ICC version but the ICC recommends the ISO version.

OK, thanks.

LR> And I'll forgo the entire "it's not good if it's not free" discussion :).

Its not whether its 'good' but whether its readilly implementable. Freely downloadable specifications make it more likely that implementors have actually read the specification.

LR> ISSUE-2344 
LR> ACTION-2821




-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 12 July 2010 16:22:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:12 UTC