- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:34:58 +1000
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
The “Pointer-events and fallback values” erratum changes the definitions of the ‘visiblePainted’ and ‘painted’ keywords to talk about whether the actual value of the relevant fill or stroke property is ‘none’ or not. http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.html#pointer-events-fallback-values Presumably “actual value” here refers to the CSS definition of the term: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-CSS2-20080411/cascade.html#actual-value However, I don’t see anything in the CSS spec (or the SVG spec) that defines that the actual value of the ‘fill’ and ‘stroke’ properties is ‘none’ if the URL wasn’t appropriate. If I’m mistaken, could somebody point out where this is defined? Otherwise, I suggest to reword the text to talk explicitly about whether fallback resulted in the URL being ignored. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 00:35:38 UTC