- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:49:59 +0200
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Tuesday, July 28, 2009, 3:34:00 AM, Cameron wrote: CM> SVG 1.1 First Edition says, in the Introduction chapter: CM> System Identifier for the SVG 1.1 Recommendation: CM> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd CM> […] For that reason, there is a single flattened DTD available that CM> corresponds to the SVG 1.1 modularized DTD. It can be found at CM> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11-flat.dtd. CM> and in the DTD appendix: CM> A dated version of the flattened DTD will always be available from CM> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11-flat-20030114.dtd. CM> I want to check what the policy is on updating any of these when we CM> publish the Second Edition. Presumably the dated version of the CM> flattened DTD should remain the same, yes CM> and a new one CM> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11-flat-2009XXXX.dtd should be CM> added. yes CM> What about the non-dated files in CM> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/? Should these all be updated? They should be the same as the ones at svg11-flat-2009XXXX.dtd CM> As part of my ACTION-2614, I’m going to move the discussion about the CM> modularised DTD from the Introduction chapter to the DTD appendix, and I CM> will downplay its usefulness. I think that is very wise. CM> Also, I’m thinking of noting in the CM> Introduction chapter that it’s not recommended to use a DOCTYPE in CM> content. Agreed. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 13:50:26 UTC