- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:37:45 -0400
- To: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Forwarded. These WG-only lists are a pain. -------- Original Message -------- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:20:33 -0700 To: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> From: David Singer <singer@apple.com> Subject: Re: Transforms Coordination Cc: CSS WG <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> At 18:07 -0400 18/03/09, L. David Baron wrote: >On Wednesday 2009-03-18 15:01 -0400, Doug Schepers wrote: >> As you know, the SVG WG want to have a long-term collaboration with you >> on a number of topics, including the Transforms specifications. >> >> Dean Jackson raised the idea of merging the SVG and CSS Transform >> specifications (at least 3D) [1] (noted in our Tracker as ISSUE-2234) >> [2], which has some merit and some points for caution. The best thing >> to do at this point may be to create a joint Task Force. Even if we end >> up with separate specs, at the very least a TF will serve as a medium >> for collaboration. >> >> Is the CSS WG open to the idea of a joint CSS-SVG Transforms Task Force? >> Obviously, I think all parties would want it to be a public group. > >What problems exist that such a task force is needed to solve? It >seems best to start off with less process (i.e., just send some >email) until more is believed to be needed. having a singe mailing-list, rather than cross-posting, and therefore having the email subject lines also appropriately tagged as being of 'joint' interest - that's one. -- David Singer Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc. -- Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 22:37:55 UTC