Re: ISSUE-2222 (test-coverage-elts-11): Missing test coverage for SVG 1.1 elements [SVG Full 1.1]

On Monday, February 16, 2009, 10:57:32 PM, Cameron wrote:

CM> Chris Lilley:
>> foreignObject is an extensibility point for things not covered by the
>> SVG specification (like HTML, for example). How would you propose
>> testing it, since by definition its for things outside the scope of
>> the specification?

CM> I’d propose testing all of the things that don’t require support for a
CM> particular extension (e.g. ensuring the x/y/width/height/transform/
CM> xlink:href/etc. attributes work and are animatable).

Yes, that would be good.

We could also test for something that should *not* be supported (eg requiredExtensions="http://example.com/completelyBogus" )


-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG

Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 22:04:17 UTC