Re: ISSUE-2222 (test-coverage-elts-11): Missing test coverage for SVG 1.1 elements [SVG Full 1.1] from Cameron McCormack on 2009-02-16 (public-svg-wg@w3.org from January to March 2009)

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:57:32 +1100
To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20090216215732.GA11516@arc.mcc.id.au>

Chris Lilley:
> foreignObject is an extensibility point for things not covered by the
> SVG specification (like HTML, for example). How would you propose
> testing it, since by definition its for things outside the scope of
> the specification?

I’d propose testing all of the things that don’t require support for a
particular extension (e.g. ensuring the x/y/width/height/transform/
xlink:href/etc. attributes work and are animatable).

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 21:58:18 UTC