Re: Wording for non-invertable CTMs with ref() (for ISSUE-2073)

Chris Lilley:
> > As just discussed on the call we agree with your proposed wording and
> > gave you ACTION-2336 to fix it. Although you said on the call that you
> > agree, please let us know you agree, in email, just for the last call
> > records. Thanks!

Cameron McCormack:
> I agree and will make the change.

Done:

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-svg-editors/2008Oct/0361.html

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Saturday, 25 October 2008 06:47:30 UTC