Re: Wording for non-invertable CTMs with ref() (for ISSUE-2073)

Chris Lilley:
> As just discussed on the call we agree with your proposed wording and
> gave you ACTION-2336 to fix it. Although you said on the call that you
> agree, please let us know you agree, in email, just for the last call
> records. Thanks!

I agree and will make the change.

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 08:34:01 UTC