ISSUE-2135 (image element ambiguities): Ambiguities in the 'image' element [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ] from SVG Working Group Issue Tracker on 2008-10-13 (public-svg-wg@w3.org from October to December 2008)

From: SVG Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:15:11 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20081013171511.0F40F6B62C@tibor.w3.org>

ISSUE-2135 (image element ambiguities): Ambiguities in the 'image' element [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ]

http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2135

Raised by: Doug Schepers
On product: Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny 

Cyril Concolato
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Oct/0110.html>:
[[
* Section 5.7 The 'image' element
In the first sentence, the words "complete document" seems to imply that an (XML) document can be referenced from an image element while the second sentence says the opposite. Could you rephrase ?

The attribute definitions for the 'image' element does not use the usual 'lacuna value sentence' for x, y, width and height.

Could you rephrase the following sentence? It does not look like a correct sentence: 
"For optimizing download time by requiring a particular content format authors are encouraged to use 'requiredFormats', instead of 'type'."

]]

Received on Monday, 13 October 2008 17:15:45 UTC