Re: Possible incompatibilty uDOM <-> SVG 1.1

• From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
• Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:03:50 +1000
• To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
• Cc: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>, public-svg-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <20080925000350.GA29012@arc.mcc.id.au>

Erik Dahlström:
> > In SVG 1.1 the 'correspondingUseElement' is of type 'SVGUseElement' [1].
> > In tiny it's of type 'SVGElement' [2].
> > 
> > The uDOM currently doesn't have the SVGUseElement interface, but I
> > think it might be more consistent if we introduced it as an empty 
> > interface inheriting from SVGElement.

Doug Schepers:
> Seems reasonable to me.

Me too.  Note that JSR 287 declares correspondingUseElement to be of
type SVGElement, but this wouldn’t cause any existing code not to
compile.

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Thursday, 25 September 2008 00:04:38 UTC