- From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:52:21 +1000
- To: Andrew Emmons <andrew@emmons.com>
- CC: W3C SVG Public Working Group <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Andrew, Great work! I've only got 9 more tests left to finish (udom-textcontent-201-t.svg to udom-traitaccess-207-t.svg). After those are complete I'll regenerate the test suite and check over it. I guess for now that's all there is to be done. We'll sync up the telcon. Thanks for the help! Anthony Andrew Emmons wrote: > Hello Anthony, > > I am done the assigned files. If you have anything you want me to do, > please let me know - otherwise we can sync up on tomorrow's telcon. > > Take care, > Andrew > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Andrew Emmons <atemmons@rogers.com> > To: anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au; Andrew Emmons <andrew@emmons.com> > Cc: W3C SVG Public Working Group <public-svg-wg@w3.org> > Sent: Monday, September 8, 2008 10:30:11 PM > Subject: Re: SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite Reference Image Summary > > Hello Anthony, > > I've reviewed and created image patches from animate-elem-02-t to > linking-a-201-t.svg. I have the media files left to review, which I > should be able to do tomorrow. > > Take care, > Andrew > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au> > To: Andrew Emmons <andrew@emmons.com> > Cc: W3C SVG Public Working Group <public-svg-wg@w3.org> > Sent: Sunday, September 7, 2008 10:05:39 PM > Subject: Re: SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite Reference Image Summary > > Hi Andrew, > > Good work with the fixes to the test suite! > > If you have time could you please check tests animate-elem-02-t to > paint-color-201-t that are marked "success" in image-source-svg-test.log > > We also need to check against the known issues list that Eirk pointed > out as we > go through the files. > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/View_the_list_of_known_issues > > I've attached to this email updated versions of the log files. > > Thanks for the help, > > Anthony > > > Andrew Emmons wrote: > > Hi Anthony! > > > > I am almost done fixing the incorrect and error files you listed. Feel > > free to send more files to me - either already verified that they are > > wrong, or give me a bunch to check and fix if needed. I'm reserving a > > couple hours each Sunday and Monday to work on these. > > > > Regards, > > Andrew > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Andrew Emmons <atemmons@rogers.com <mailto:atemmons@rogers.com>> > > To: anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au > <mailto:anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>; W3C SVG Public Working Group > > <public-svg-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-svg-wg@w3.org>> > > Sent: Friday, September 5, 2008 8:26:18 AM > > Subject: Re: SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite Reference Image Summary > > > > Hey Anthony, > > > > This is great stuff! > > > > >I guess the first thing we need to do is fix the references marked as > > "ERROR" > > >and "INCORRECT". > > > > I can do all of the above for the files found so far if you want to > > focus on going through the 'success' files to ensure they are correct. > > > > Take care, > > Andrew > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au > <mailto:anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>> > > To: W3C SVG Public Working Group <public-svg-wg@w3.org > <mailto:public-svg-wg@w3.org>> > > Sent: Friday, September 5, 2008 3:39:21 AM > > Subject: SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite Reference Image Summary > > > > Hi WG of Awesomeness, > > > > As per our discussion in last nights telephone conference I have > prepared a > > report on the state of SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite reference images. > > > > Overall Summary > > --------------- > > - Number of PNG patches: 227 > > - Number of SVG tests: 229 (test files rendered by Batik to produce a > > reference) > > - Number of SVG patches: 48 > > > > Where we need to focus is on the SVG patches and SVG Test Files > rendered by > > Batik. Attached to this email two log files: > image-source-svg-test.log and > > image-source-svg-patch.log. > > > > image-source-svg-test.log - Contains the results of the SVG test files > > rendered > > by Batik. > > > > image-source-svg-patch.log - Contains the results of the SVG patch files > > rendered by Batik. > > > > > > > > SVG Test File Summary > > --------------------- > > Files marked as "success" are files that rendered with Batik returning > > success. > > These files have *not* been checked to see if they are rendered correct. > > There > > are 222 of these files. > > > > Files marked as "INCORRECT" are files that rendered with Batik returning > > success > > but there was a problem during render. These files are incorrectly > > rendered. > > There are 3 of these files. > > > > Files marked as "ERROR" are files that Batik attempted render but > > returned with > > an error. These files are 0 byte files. There are 4 of these files. > > > > > > > > SVG Patch File Summary > > ---------------------- > > Files marked as "success" are files that rendered with Batik returning > > success. > > These files have *not* been checked to see if they are rendered correct. > > There > > are 43 of these files. > > > > Files marked as "INCORRECT" are files that rendered with Batik returning > > success > > however these files produce an incorrect reference. There are 5 of these > > files. > > > > > > > > I guess the first thing we need to do is fix the references marked as > > "ERROR" > > and "INCORRECT". Then we should try to go through as many files that > Batik > > renders and returns "success" on to ensure they are correct. > > > > If we need anymore information please let me know. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Anthony
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2008 01:53:06 UTC