W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite Reference Image Summary

From: Andrew Emmons <atemmons@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 19:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au, Andrew Emmons <andrew@emmons.com>
Cc: W3C SVG Public Working Group <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <552773.22931.qm@web88206.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Hello Anthony,

I've reviewed and created image patches from animate-elem-02-t to linking-a-201-t.svg. I have the media files left to review, which I should be able to do tomorrow.

Take care,
Andrew




----- Original Message ----
From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
To: Andrew Emmons <andrew@emmons.com>
Cc: W3C SVG Public Working Group <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 7, 2008 10:05:39 PM
Subject: Re: SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite Reference Image Summary

Hi Andrew,

Good work with the fixes to the test suite!

If you have time could you please check tests animate-elem-02-t to 
paint-color-201-t that are marked "success" in image-source-svg-test.log

We also need to check against the known issues list that Eirk pointed out as we 
go through the files.

http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/View_the_list_of_known_issues

I've attached to this email updated versions of the log files.

Thanks for the help,

Anthony


Andrew Emmons wrote:
> Hi Anthony!
> 
> I am almost done fixing the incorrect and error files you listed. Feel 
> free to send more files to me - either already verified that they are 
> wrong, or give me a bunch to check and fix if needed. I'm reserving a 
> couple hours each Sunday and Monday to work on these.
> 
> Regards,
> Andrew
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Andrew Emmons <atemmons@rogers.com>
> To: anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au; W3C SVG Public Working Group 
> <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 5, 2008 8:26:18 AM
> Subject: Re: SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite Reference Image Summary
> 
> Hey Anthony,
> 
> This is great stuff!
> 
>  >I guess the first thing we need to do is fix the references marked as 
> "ERROR"
>  >and "INCORRECT".
> 
> I can do all of the above for the files found so far if you want to 
> focus on going through the 'success' files to ensure they are correct.
> 
> Take care,
> Andrew
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
> To: W3C SVG Public Working Group <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 5, 2008 3:39:21 AM
> Subject: SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite Reference Image Summary
> 
> Hi WG of Awesomeness,
> 
> As per our discussion in last nights telephone conference I have prepared a
> report on the state of SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite reference images.
> 
> Overall Summary
> ---------------
>   - Number of PNG patches: 227
>   - Number of SVG tests: 229 (test files rendered by Batik to produce a 
> reference)
>   - Number of SVG patches: 48
> 
> Where we need to focus is on the SVG patches and SVG Test Files rendered by
> Batik. Attached to this email two log files: image-source-svg-test.log and
> image-source-svg-patch.log.
> 
> image-source-svg-test.log - Contains the results of the SVG test files 
> rendered
> by Batik.
> 
> image-source-svg-patch.log - Contains the results of the SVG patch files
> rendered by Batik.
> 
> 
> 
> SVG Test File Summary
> ---------------------
> Files marked as "success" are files that rendered with Batik returning 
> success.
> These files have *not* been checked to see if they are rendered correct. 
> There
> are 222 of these files.
> 
> Files marked as "INCORRECT" are files that rendered with Batik returning 
> success
> but there was a problem during render. These files are incorrectly 
> rendered.
> There are 3 of these files.
> 
> Files marked as "ERROR" are files that Batik attempted render but 
> returned with
> an error. These files are 0 byte files. There are 4 of these files.
> 
> 
> 
> SVG Patch File Summary
> ----------------------
> Files marked as "success" are files that rendered with Batik returning 
> success.
> These files have *not* been checked to see if they are rendered correct. 
> There
> are 43 of these files.
> 
> Files marked as "INCORRECT" are files that rendered with Batik returning 
> success
> however these files produce an incorrect reference. There are 5 of these 
> files.
> 
> 
> 
> I guess the first thing we need to do is fix the references marked as 
> "ERROR"
> and "INCORRECT". Then we should try to go through as many files that Batik
> renders and returns "success" on to ensure they are correct.
> 
> If we need anymore information please let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anthony
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 02:42:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:09 UTC