- From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:18:08 +1000
- To: W3C SVG Public Working Group <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
I've added patch PNGs for animate-elem-222-t.svg and animate-elem-226-t.svg Anthony Grasso wrote: > Hi WG of Awesomeness, > > As per our discussion in last nights telephone conference I have > prepared a report on the state of SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite reference images. > > Overall Summary > --------------- > - Number of PNG patches: 227 > - Number of SVG tests: 229 (test files rendered by Batik to produce a > reference) > - Number of SVG patches: 48 > > Where we need to focus is on the SVG patches and SVG Test Files rendered > by Batik. Attached to this email two log files: > image-source-svg-test.log and image-source-svg-patch.log. > > image-source-svg-test.log - Contains the results of the SVG test files > rendered by Batik. > > image-source-svg-patch.log - Contains the results of the SVG patch files > rendered by Batik. > > > > SVG Test File Summary > --------------------- > Files marked as "success" are files that rendered with Batik returning > success. These files have *not* been checked to see if they are rendered > correct. There are 222 of these files. > > Files marked as "INCORRECT" are files that rendered with Batik returning > success but there was a problem during render. These files are > incorrectly rendered. There are 3 of these files. > > Files marked as "ERROR" are files that Batik attempted render but > returned with an error. These files are 0 byte files. There are 4 of > these files. > > > > SVG Patch File Summary > ---------------------- > Files marked as "success" are files that rendered with Batik returning > success. These files have *not* been checked to see if they are rendered > correct. There are 43 of these files. > > Files marked as "INCORRECT" are files that rendered with Batik returning > success however these files produce an incorrect reference. There are 5 > of these files. > > > > I guess the first thing we need to do is fix the references marked as > "ERROR" and "INCORRECT". Then we should try to go through as many files > that Batik renders and returns "success" on to ensure they are correct. > > If we need anymore information please let me know. > > Thanks, > > Anthony >
Received on Friday, 5 September 2008 08:18:50 UTC