- From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:51:25 +0200
- To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:04:47 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > On Jul 14, 2008, at 12:28 AM, Erik Dahlström wrote: > >> >> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:01:36 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: ... >> The webkit team is represented on the SVG WG (by Apple), and it >> would have been great if the comments would have been heard there >> when this errata was discussed. > > If you'd like specific errata reviewed on behalf of Apple or the > WebKit project in the future, please let me know. But we probably > won't be able to give detailed immediate review of every erratum > without being specifically asked. Agendas are sent out on a regular basis to the public-svg-wg list, and anything being an errata discussion is usually marked as such. It would be my suggestion to read the related email/issues/actions and post comments to the list, and if possible, attending the telcon that discusses the errata item(s). > As for the substance of the change, it seems very strange to me that > whether the method throws depends on which range endpoint is out of > bounds. It would make more sense to either always clamp to the text > node's available range (returning 0 if you end up outside the range > entirely), or always throw when either endpoint is out of bounds, but > the current mix makes for a strange programming model. Fair enough, and your preference is for which of these models? Cheers /Erik -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2008 06:51:41 UTC