- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 19:11:06 +0200
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hello group, the comment on animate-elem-224-t.svg in http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Tiny_12 I cannot understand. It tests the combination/behaviour of two to animations for one attribute in the same time interval. Due to SMIL rules this results in a quadratic path as trajectory. The combination is choosen in such a way, that it is relatively simple to calulate the quadratic path the animations result in - there is no simpler path for two to-animations combined in such a way. I think, for other combinations it is slightly more difficult to calculate the resulting trajectory, therefore this is already a basic test for to-animations (I already have more complex with restarting the animations within active duration, changing priorities in the SMIL timing sandwich model, where it is harder to calculate the trajectory). Even more for four to-animations for one attribute, the resulting trajectory is a fourth order curve, not even exactly available in SVG, therefore the combination of two animations resulting in a quadratic path is already a nice and simple choice to check the correct behaviour precisely.
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 17:20:08 UTC