Brian Birtles via GitHub
- Re: [svgwg] Add `interfaces` for <discard> definition (#855)
- Re: [svgwg] Add `interfaces` for <discard> definition (#855)
- Closed: [svgwg] [animations] `<discard>` lacks `DOM Interfaces:` (#854)
- [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: Add `interfaces` for <discard> definition
DFB via GitHub
- Closed: [svgwg] Failed to execute 'isPointInFill' on 'SVGGeometryElement': parameter 1 is not of type 'SVGPoint'. (#858)
- [svgwg] Failed to execute 'isPointInFill' on 'SVGGeometryElement': parameter 1 is not of type 'SVGPoint'. (#858)
Kagami Sascha Rosylight via GitHub
- [svgwg] [animations] The published bits do not reflect the `main` branch (#857)
- Re: [svgwg] [svg-paths] Fix IDL syntax errors (#806)
- [svgwg] Closed Pull Request: [svg-paths] Fix IDL syntax errors
- [svgwg] Pull Request: Refer to `main` branch instead of `master`
- Re: [svgwg] Add `interfaces` for <discard> definition (#855)
- [svgwg] Pull Request: Add `interfaces` for <discard> definition
- [svgwg] [animations] `<discard>` lacks `DOM Interfaces:` (#854)
Marcus Rohrmoser via GitHub
Paul LeBeau via GitHub
Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
Philippe Verdy via GitHub
Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub
tatarize via GitHub
- Re: [svgwg] Inconsistent error handling of negative radius arcs. (#853)
- Re: [svgwg] Inconsistent error handling of negative radius arcs. (#853)
- [svgwg] Inconsistent error handling of negative radius arcs. (#853)
- Re: [svgwg] Clarified path data omission rules (#827)
- Re: [svgwg] Distinguish Two Main SVG Types of Usage (#837)