- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:11:30 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
> I don't understand why we have references to both HTML 5.1 2nd Edition and also HTML LS. Because no one has gone through and updated all the references & links to W3C HTML to point to their matching places in WHATWG. I don't think there are any details we need to reference that are only in the W3C versions. > Do we really still have a normative dependency on Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0) ? It looks like we still have definitions of SMIL-related events in interact.html. (Probably should see if those can be safely moved to the separate animations module.) The other thing that is borrowed from SMIL is `<switch>`, and we have a normative reference for the `allowReorder` behavior. So at the very least the ref should stay for that. > Wondering whether WOFF 2 should be added, alongside WOFF 1? Possibly as an informative ref? Right now we say that WOFF (level 1) support is required, it would be a normative change to bump that up to WOFF2. -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/514#issuecomment-414373450 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 20 August 2018 16:11:31 UTC