- From: ewilligers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:42:02 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
+1 for the proposed method. It would have been useful when polyfilling CSS Motion Path. > the directionality of the path at a vertex is separate from the marker orientation What is the motivation? Can they be consistent? > It would be nice to know why the Chromium team decided to implement motion paths the way they did. I've replied in [w3c/fxtf-drafts#209.](https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/209) I simply reused the Chromium code that is used by animateMotion rotation, without checking if there were issues. BTW, does the SVG WG group have any face to face meetings scheduled, or does it have any APAC-friendly teleconference times? Is there a mailing list I should join? (Apologies for issue noise.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by ewilligers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/338#issuecomment-320641533 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 7 August 2017 11:42:12 UTC