[svgwg] Issue: Use a single-case name for meshGradient marked as DoC_positiveResponse

nikosandronikos has just labeled an issue for 
https://github.com/w3c/svgwg as "DoC_positiveResponse":

== Use a single-case name for meshGradient ==
As explained in #140, we've opted to separate out the paint server 
aspect of mesh gradients from the renderable graphics aspect.  
Currently, the draft uses `<meshGradient>` and `<mesh>` respectively, 
but the camelCased `<meshGradient>` contradicts with the working 
group's commitment to not introduce new camelCase names (as discussed 
in #161).

@nikosandronikos has argued against the name `<meshgradient>` 
*without* camelCase (and I agree with him), because of inconsistency 
with the existing `<linearGradient>` and `<radialGradient>`.  It's 
confusing enough that we have some camelCase and some single-case 
names, without having them so similar as well.

So we need a new name.  Again, we're using the name `<mesh>` for an 
element that creates a painted shape on screen, the missing name is 
for the element that defines the shape and color stops.

My best recommendation: `<meshgrid>`.  I think that makes clear that 
this is the element that contains `<meshrow>`s of `<meshpatch>`es.

See https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/181

Received on Sunday, 7 August 2016 11:10:05 UTC