- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:40:59 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
@shepazu I don't think we want to revert the changes. That would be very unfortunate for long-term goals of improved interoperability. If Shadow DOM spec doesn't stabilize, we may need to introduce a few additional details so that the use-element shadow DOM can be implemented without a normative reference to it. Then we could have some informative paragraphs about how the two specs are intended. PS, You'll need to confirm with the Shadow DOM editors, but the intention may be to simply integrate it in core DOM, instead of having a separate spec. That is what's been done on WHATWG side. In fact, we could probably make it a normative reference to the WHATWG DOM standard instead of to W3C Shadow DOM. The only reason I didn't do that was because we have normative references to W3C DOM 4 elsewhere. -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/99#issuecomment-237001066 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2016 18:43:14 UTC