- From: Rob Russell <rob@latenightpc.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:45:03 -0400
- To: "Porter, David A" <david.a.porter@boeing.com>
- CC: Andreas Neumann <a.neumann@carto.net>, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>, SVG IG List <public-svg-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4A16E49F.6000608@latenightpc.com>
It's a pain, but iirc even "Eastern" isn't a perfect descriptor. Where I am we're using EDT (UTC -4) right now but some places in the Eastern time zone don't celebrate daylight savings time so they'd still be on EST (UTC-5). UTC doesn't change with daylight savings time, so the proposed time is Tuesday 18:00 UTC. That's 2:00pm EDT. Central Europe is on CEST right now (UTC+2) so the local time proposed there is 20:00, in the winter on CET (UTC+1) it would be 19:00 but I expect we'll have to change it again by then since people's schedules and availability change. It's a nuisance to convert but stating the time in UTC & a few other timezones seems to be the most clear thing we can do. Oh, and 2:00pm on Tuesdays is fine for me :) Rob Russell rob@latenightpc.com http://www.latenightpc.com/blog 519-968-1161 Porter, David A wrote: > I vote for providing times in human-readable form, i.e. "Eastern" time. > It's a lot easier to translate into the conditions of wherever you're > at. At least for people not that accustomed to UTC math. > >> David.A.Porter@Boeing.com >> Distributed Server Integration, 9T-IT-TL40 >> Boeing Information Technology, Bellevue Washington USA >> * phone 253-223-4732, other contact options at >> > http://card.web.boeing.com/WebCard.cfm?id=113185 > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Neumann [mailto:a.neumann@carto.net] > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 10:52 PM > To: Jeff Schiller > Cc: SVG IG List > Subject: Re: Proposed SVG IG Conf Call: Tues May 26th > > Seems good to me. > > When discussing times, there is always the question whether we need to > add daylight savings or not. > > As an example, in winter time middle europe is UTC+1, but in summer > time, we are UTC+2. > > Are you suggesting 19:00 UTC+2 ? (which is UTC+1 in winter?) or would > this be 20:00? > > Andreas > > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 3:56 am, Jeff Schiller wrote: > >> After looking over the schedules, it seems that the following time is >> acceptable to most (but not all) people: >> >> Tue 13:00 UTC-5 / Tue 14:00 UTC-4 / Tue 19:00 UTC+1 / Tue 22:00 >> UTC+4 >> >> Please chime in on your opinion of this timeslot as soon as possible. >> >> Thanks, >> Jeff >> >> >> > > > -- > Andreas Neumann > http://www.carto.net/neumann/ > http://www.svgopen.org/ > > > >
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 17:47:08 UTC