- From: Ruud Steltenpool <svg@steltenpower.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:11:08 +0200
- To: public-svg-ig@w3.org
David wrote: > Ruud has been writing about a nifty way of tweaking such attributes that might allow the quick exploration of the parameter space associate with such things, so perhaps he'll have something to say on this Below a summary of an e-mail conversation that David was aiming at: ------------- Ruud: thinking about your 'interacting with or animating attribute values to get a feel for what they're doing': What if there would be a (foreign Namespace) notation like <playWithAttribute xPathexpr="" ... /> and a processor that would use it to make SVG files interactive in some automagic fashion ? ... You have an XML document (SVG, XHTML, or myOwnXML (+ XBL resulting in SVG or XHTML), or ...) you want to play with, especially certain parameters, which i call data.xml In a 2nd document, which i call interests.xml, you define which parameters of data.xml you want to play with. A processor is needed that takes data.xml and interests.xml and outputs an interactionForm.xml (.xhtml or .svg really) choosing form elements based on the schema (XSD, RNG, DTD, whatever works) of data.xml and extra information or overriding defined in interests.xml , which through automatically generated DOM-methods interacts with the original data.xml David: Yes. If I follow you it would help speed the process of optimizing the presentation of certain complex interactions between clips, filters, and so forth by giving access to a sort of control panel for attributes of particular interest. I've had to (in builiding either artistic or technical presentations) had to go through many generations of tweaking, by hand, many values of many attributes until I get it to look "right." -------------- How does this sound? I guess 'XForms people' would be the ones to ask for experience with something in that direction. Feedback please. /me struggled with DTD-parsing when i worked on a more novice coder friendly validator-PLUS for SVG some time ago
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 21:11:49 UTC