Re: use some kind of issue tracking tool to manage spec changes?

Matt,
How do we setup "Speech API" as a product under bugzilla, with the
description "Documents of the Speech API Community Group" ?

/Glen Shires


On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Deborah Dahl <
dahl@conversational-technologies.com> wrote:

> I think bugzilla would also work. I have more experience with Tracker, but
> I
> know a lot of groups have been satisfied with bugzilla.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Olli Pettay [mailto:Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 9:51 AM
> > To: Deborah Dahl
> > Cc: public-speech-api@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: use some kind of issue tracking tool to manage spec changes?
> >
> > On 09/12/2012 03:44 PM, Deborah Dahl wrote:
> > > I think it's hard to follow all the discussion on this list just by
> using the
> > mailing list archive. I propose that we use some sort of tracking/issue
> > > tool. Personally, I think the W3C Tracker tool would be fine.
> > >
> >
> > I agree using a bug tracker for resolving issues could be nice.
> >
> > W3C has bugzilla, which is way more nicer for issue tracking than
> Tracker,
> and
> > it lets also non-group-members to file bugs.
> > WebApps, HTML, etc use bugzilla.
> > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Olli
>
>
>