- From: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:53:35 -0400
- To: <olli@pettay.fi>
- Cc: <public-speech-api@w3.org>
I think bugzilla would also work. I have more experience with Tracker, but I know a lot of groups have been satisfied with bugzilla. > -----Original Message----- > From: Olli Pettay [mailto:Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 9:51 AM > To: Deborah Dahl > Cc: public-speech-api@w3.org > Subject: Re: use some kind of issue tracking tool to manage spec changes? > > On 09/12/2012 03:44 PM, Deborah Dahl wrote: > > I think it's hard to follow all the discussion on this list just by using the > mailing list archive. I propose that we use some sort of tracking/issue > > tool. Personally, I think the W3C Tracker tool would be fine. > > > > I agree using a bug tracker for resolving issues could be nice. > > W3C has bugzilla, which is way more nicer for issue tracking than Tracker, and > it lets also non-group-members to file bugs. > WebApps, HTML, etc use bugzilla. > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/ > > > > > > -Olli
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2012 13:54:13 UTC