How about SpeechRecognition and SpeechSynthesis instead of SpeechRecognizer
and SpeechSynthesizer?
The reason being that the APIs are really interfaces to control and
dispatch speech recognition and synthesis at a high level, the actual
recognizer and synthesizer are not necessarily local (though they could
be), they may be in a different process or on a remote server.
- Dominic
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Hans Wennborg <hwennborg@google.com> wrote:
> Picking up this thread again.
>
> I get the impression that we're pretty happy with the names
> SpeechRecognizer and SpeechSynthesizer?
>
> If so, I would like to go ahead and rename SpeechRecognition to
> SpeechRecognizer and TTS to SpeechSynthesizer in the spec unless there
> are any objections.
>
> Thanks,
> Hans
>