- From: Hans Wennborg <hwennborg@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:08:16 +0100
- To: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>
- Cc: public-speech-api@w3.org, Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>, Glen Shires <gshires@google.com>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com> wrote: > How about SpeechRecognition and SpeechSynthesis instead of SpeechRecognizer > and SpeechSynthesizer? > > The reason being that the APIs are really interfaces to control and dispatch > speech recognition and synthesis at a high level, the actual recognizer and > synthesizer are not necessarily local (though they could be), they may be in > a different process or on a remote server. That's a good argument. I'm happy with SpeechRecognition and SpeechSynthesis if others agree. Thanks, Hans
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 17:09:10 UTC