Re: the suggested initial goal [ Re: Welcome!

On 11/07/16 17:16, james anderson wrote:
> good afternoon;
>
>> On 2016-07-11, at 18:09, Peter F. Patel-Schneider 
>> <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 07/06/2016 07:09 AM, james anderson wrote:
>>> good afternoon;
>>>
>>>> On 2016-07-06, at 15:41, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org 
>>>> <mailto:andy@apache.org>
>>>> <mailto:andy@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Peter,
>>>>
>>>> Would you pleased resend your summary "Thu, 30 Jun 2016 06:05:27 
>>>> -0700"?
>>>>
>>>> That's a concrete list place we can use as a starting point for 
>>>> discussing
>>>> the scope of the work.
>>>
>>> it would help to have a list with the content indicated by this mock-up
>>>
>>> https://github.com/w3c/sparql-exists/wiki/Examples
>>>
>>> to lay out the scope in concrete, neutral terms.
>>>
>>> best regards, from berlin,
>>> ---
>>> james anderson | james@dydra.com <mailto:james@dydra.com> 
>>> <mailto:james@dydra.com> | http://dydra.com
>>>
>>
>> It seems to me that if the group is going to have examples, then it 
>> makes more
>> sense to have the examples be in the form of a test suite that can be
>> processed by current test suite tools.
> while this is an eventual goal,
>>  The tests could easily have extra
>> material, such as a property that provides the defined results as per the
>> current SPARQL spec.
>
> that practice make it more difficult to comprenend this issues, to 
> understand tests in relation to each other and to discuss the results.
> the current test suite is “exemplary” in this regard.
james -

Do you want to produce some examples for one of the issues?  Then I 
think we'll be clear what you mean and how the examples get us to tests.

(BTW The example on the wiki does not display - the wiki is markdown not 
HTML)

     Andy



>
> best regards, from berlin,
> ---
> james anderson | james@dydra.com <mailto:james@dydra.com> | 
> http://dydra.com
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 14:01:05 UTC