Re: the suggested initial goal [ Re: Welcome!

good afternoon;

> On 2016-07-11, at 18:09, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 07/06/2016 07:09 AM, james anderson wrote:
>> good afternoon;
>> 
>>> On 2016-07-06, at 15:41, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org
>>> <mailto:andy@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Peter,
>>> 
>>> Would you pleased resend your summary "Thu, 30 Jun 2016 06:05:27 -0700"?
>>> 
>>> That's a concrete list place we can use as a starting point for discussing
>>> the scope of the work.
>> 
>> it would help to have a list with the content indicated by this mock-up
>> 
>>    https://github.com/w3c/sparql-exists/wiki/Examples
>> 
>> to lay out the scope in concrete, neutral terms.
>> 
>> best regards, from berlin,
>> ---
>> james anderson | james@dydra.com <mailto:james@dydra.com> | http://dydra.com
>> 
> 
> It seems to me that if the group is going to have examples, then it makes more
> sense to have the examples be in the form of a test suite that can be
> processed by current test suite tools.
while this is an eventual goal,
>  The tests could easily have extra
> material, such as a property that provides the defined results as per the
> current SPARQL spec.

that practice make it more difficult to comprenend this issues, to understand tests in relation to each other and to discuss the results.
the current test suite is “exemplary” in this regard.

best regards, from berlin,
---
james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com