- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:09:50 -0700
- To: james anderson <james@dydra.com>, public-sparql-exists@w3.org
On 07/06/2016 07:09 AM, james anderson wrote: > good afternoon; > >> On 2016-07-06, at 15:41, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org >> <mailto:andy@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> Peter, >> >> Would you pleased resend your summary "Thu, 30 Jun 2016 06:05:27 -0700"? >> >> That's a concrete list place we can use as a starting point for discussing >> the scope of the work. > > it would help to have a list with the content indicated by this mock-up > > https://github.com/w3c/sparql-exists/wiki/Examples > > to lay out the scope in concrete, neutral terms. > > best regards, from berlin, > --- > james anderson | james@dydra.com <mailto:james@dydra.com> | http://dydra.com > It seems to me that if the group is going to have examples, then it makes more sense to have the examples be in the form of a test suite that can be processed by current test suite tools. The tests could easily have extra material, such as a property that provides the defined results as per the current SPARQL spec. peter
Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 16:11:21 UTC