- From: Steve Harris <s.w.harris@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:52:45 +0100
- To: public-sparql-exists@w3.org
> On 4 Jul 2016, at 16:32, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > > On Jul 4, 2016, at 7:48 AM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Welcome! >> >> The “SPARQL Maintenance (EXISTS)” Community Group is a forum to discuss and address problems with the “EXISTS” feature in SPARQL 1.1. >> >> This community group will create CG Notes and accompanying test suites to describe one or more improvements with an emphasis on maintaining compatibility. >> >> >> We have the following resources: >> >> Email: public-sparql-exists@w3.org >> >> Anyone can subscribe - please do consider joining the CG if you are planning on tracking it. You will need to sign-up to contribute. >> >> Archive: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sparql-exists/ >> >> Github: https://github.com/w3c/sparql-exists/ >> >> >> CG has space on github, including github.io pages. Please send me offlist your github id and I can add you to the repo. >> >> >> Decisions: >> >> We are a small group and already have people in a number of timezones. Telecons are not going to be easy to schedule and will inevitably inconvenience someone so I don't think they will help, and certainly not as a decision forum. >> >> I'd like to propose we use the email list for decisions usually with "call for consensus". For certain things like publishing a CG Note or a specific version of the test suite we might want a vote - the Apache process for a vote is "majority and at least 3 +1" - to have a decision URL for the record. > > +1 > > Gregg +1 - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2016 08:46:35 UTC