- From: Bruno P. Kinoshita <kinow@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 05:59:45 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>, "public-sparql-exists@w3.org" <public-sparql-exists@w3.org>
Sounds good to me. +1 Bruno ----- Original Message ----- > From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> > To: public-sparql-exists@w3.org > Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2016 2:48 AM > Subject: Welcome! > > Welcome! > > The “SPARQL Maintenance (EXISTS)” Community Group is a forum to discuss > and address problems with the “EXISTS” feature in SPARQL 1.1. > > This community group will create CG Notes and accompanying test suites > to describe one or more improvements with an emphasis on maintaining > compatibility. > > > We have the following resources: > > Email: public-sparql-exists@w3.org > > Anyone can subscribe - please do consider joining the CG if you are > planning on tracking it. You will need to sign-up to contribute. > > Archive: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sparql-exists/ > > Github: https://github.com/w3c/sparql-exists/ > > > CG has space on github, including github.io pages. Please send me > offlist your github id and I can add you to the repo. > > > Decisions: > > We are a small group and already have people in a number of timezones. > Telecons are not going to be easy to schedule and will inevitably > inconvenience someone so I don't think they will help, and certainly not > as a decision forum. > > I'd like to propose we use the email list for decisions usually with > "call for consensus". For certain things like publishing a CG Note or > a > specific version of the test suite we might want a vote - the Apache > process for a vote is "majority and at least 3 +1" - to have a > decision > URL for the record. > > Andy > > https://www.w3.org/community/sparql-exists/2016/07/01/call-for-participation-in-sparql-maintenance-exists-community-group/ >
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2016 06:04:34 UTC