- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 08:32:05 -0700
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Cc: public-sparql-exists@w3.org
On Jul 4, 2016, at 7:48 AM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: > > Welcome! > > The “SPARQL Maintenance (EXISTS)” Community Group is a forum to discuss and address problems with the “EXISTS” feature in SPARQL 1.1. > > This community group will create CG Notes and accompanying test suites to describe one or more improvements with an emphasis on maintaining compatibility. > > > We have the following resources: > > Email: public-sparql-exists@w3.org > > Anyone can subscribe - please do consider joining the CG if you are planning on tracking it. You will need to sign-up to contribute. > > Archive: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sparql-exists/ > > Github: https://github.com/w3c/sparql-exists/ > > > CG has space on github, including github.io pages. Please send me offlist your github id and I can add you to the repo. > > > Decisions: > > We are a small group and already have people in a number of timezones. Telecons are not going to be easy to schedule and will inevitably inconvenience someone so I don't think they will help, and certainly not as a decision forum. > > I'd like to propose we use the email list for decisions usually with "call for consensus". For certain things like publishing a CG Note or a specific version of the test suite we might want a vote - the Apache process for a vote is "majority and at least 3 +1" - to have a decision URL for the record. +1 Gregg > Andy > > https://www.w3.org/community/sparql-exists/2016/07/01/call-for-participation-in-sparql-maintenance-exists-community-group/ >
Received on Monday, 4 July 2016 15:32:37 UTC