Re: where are we at?

Thanks Jerven,

For what it's worth I still have it on my radar to produce a draft SEP for
issue 43 / 59, it's just been tricky finding the time. I'll try and
actually get something written this week, and hopefully that will also
naturally lead to a suitable agenda point for a potential meeting.

Cheers,

Jeen

On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 00:16, Jerven Tjalling Bolleman
<Jerven.Bolleman@sib.swiss> wrote:

> Hi Jeen, All,
>
> Just crawling from under my pile of other commitments :(
>
> I finally took some time to write down a rough draft SEP for issue
> https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/13 which is not a quick and easy
> win SEP.
>
> My next SEP will be on https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/101,
> which I think is a trivial SEP and for which a lot of implementation
> already exists.
>
> Now regarding to some meetings, I think we can now actually have some
> with enough content to have an effective agenda. In the beginning I
> wanted to avoid to meetings, as they are not always the most effective
> ways to spend our precious time.
> Also they can be quite exclusionary regarding participants in different
> timezones and work environments.
>
> I would be happy to set up a doodle for times, if people would send me
> issues to discuss in the first meeting.
>
> Regards,
> Jerven
>
> On 2020-08-04 05:40, Jeen Broekstra wrote:
> > There's a few proposals that have my interest, but high on my wish
> > list and a relatively easy one to fix is a solution for
> > https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/43, possibly in combination
> > with https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/59 [1]. (a standard way
> > to refer to the unnamed graph and/or the union graph). It's a fairly
> > straightforward improvement, I imagine a SEP could be drafted for that
> > quite quickly. The many tool specific solutions that exist in this
> > space are IMO strong evidence for the need for something more
> > standardized.
> >
> > I'll see what I can do over the next few days.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jeen
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, at 13:17, Gregory Williams wrote:
> >
> >> On Aug 3, 2020, at 5:40 PM, Jeen Broekstra <jeen@fastmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Andy, for reminding me about the SEP thing!
> >>>
> >>> This completely slipped my mind, and to be honest it took me a
> >>> while to figure where to actually find the SEPs (I think I
> >>> originally interpreted this as a proposal for a github issue
> >>> template). I now realize they are written down as Markdown
> >>> documents in https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/tree/master/SEP .
> >>>
> >>> If I were to spend some time on some of the proposals I care about
> >>> and try and formulate them as a SEP, would that be appreciated?
> >>> Sorry if this seems a silly question -  I genuinely didn't realize
> >>> we were doing this.
> >>
> >> I think that would be greatly appreciated. Do you already have
> >> particular issues/topics in mind?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Greg
> >
> >
> >
> > Links:
> > ------
> > [1] https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/43
>
> --
> Jerven Tjalling Bolleman
> SIB | Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
> CMU - 1, rue Michel Servet - 1211 Geneva 4
> t: +41 22 379 58 85 - f: +41 22 379 58 58
> Jerven.Bolleman@sib.swiss - http://www.sib.swiss
>
>
>

-- 
Dr Jeen Broekstra (he, him)
*principal software engineer*

jb@metaphacts.com
www.metaphacts.com

[image: htps://www.metaphacts.com/] <https://www.metaphacts.com/>