Re: where are we at?

Hi Jeen, All,

Just crawling from under my pile of other commitments :(

I finally took some time to write down a rough draft SEP for issue 
https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/13 which is not a quick and easy 
win SEP.

My next SEP will be on https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/101, 
which I think is a trivial SEP and for which a lot of implementation 
already exists.

Now regarding to some meetings, I think we can now actually have some 
with enough content to have an effective agenda. In the beginning I 
wanted to avoid to meetings, as they are not always the most effective 
ways to spend our precious time.
Also they can be quite exclusionary regarding participants in different 
timezones and work environments.

I would be happy to set up a doodle for times, if people would send me 
issues to discuss in the first meeting.

Regards,
Jerven

On 2020-08-04 05:40, Jeen Broekstra wrote:
> There's a few proposals that have my interest, but high on my wish
> list and a relatively easy one to fix is a solution for
> https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/43, possibly in combination
> with https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/59 [1]. (a standard way
> to refer to the unnamed graph and/or the union graph). It's a fairly
> straightforward improvement, I imagine a SEP could be drafted for that
> quite quickly. The many tool specific solutions that exist in this
> space are IMO strong evidence for the need for something more
> standardized.
> 
> I'll see what I can do over the next few days.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jeen
> 
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, at 13:17, Gregory Williams wrote:
> 
>> On Aug 3, 2020, at 5:40 PM, Jeen Broekstra <jeen@fastmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks Andy, for reminding me about the SEP thing!
>>> 
>>> This completely slipped my mind, and to be honest it took me a
>>> while to figure where to actually find the SEPs (I think I
>>> originally interpreted this as a proposal for a github issue
>>> template). I now realize they are written down as Markdown
>>> documents in https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/tree/master/SEP .
>>> 
>>> If I were to spend some time on some of the proposals I care about
>>> and try and formulate them as a SEP, would that be appreciated?
>>> Sorry if this seems a silly question -  I genuinely didn't realize
>>> we were doing this.
>> 
>> I think that would be greatly appreciated. Do you already have
>> particular issues/topics in mind?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Greg
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/43

-- 
Jerven Tjalling Bolleman
SIB | Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
CMU - 1, rue Michel Servet - 1211 Geneva 4
t: +41 22 379 58 85 - f: +41 22 379 58 58
Jerven.Bolleman@sib.swiss - http://www.sib.swiss

Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2020 14:15:37 UTC