Re: where are we at?

Thanks Andy, for reminding me about the SEP thing!

This completely slipped my mind, and to be honest it took me a while to figure where to actually find the SEPs (I think I originally interpreted this as a proposal for a github issue template). I now realize they are written down as Markdown documents in https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/tree/master/SEP .

If I were to spend some time on some of the proposals I care about and try and formulate them as a SEP, would that be appreciated? Sorry if this seems a silly question -  I genuinely didn't realize we were doing this. 

Doing some meetings at some point would be good too to build some momentum, but that would be helped by having some more draft SEPs I believe. 

I'll also keep a closer eye on our gitter room :) 

Jeen


On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, at 06:53, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Good question!
> 
> There are a lot of good suggestions, many with consensus on an approach. 
> The suggestion for moving forward is SEP's [1] to move those from 
> discussion to design documents. Is there a different way to proceed, 
> instead or or as well as?
> 
> Of course, everyone is busy.
> 
> Maybe we need to have meetings  in order to bring what time people can 
> find to focus on a one/a few items at a time.
> 
>      Andy
> 
> [1]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sparql-12/2019Oct/0000.html
> 
> On 30/07/2020 23:56, Jeen Broekstra wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > I was just wondering where we are at as a community group, at the 
> > moment, and how we intend to proceed. We seem to have a fairly solid 
> > collection of proposals for improvements and extensions, and a lot of 
> > input from different stakeholders, which is great!
> > 
> > I realize the purpose of this group is not to come up with a new 
> > standard but rather to facilitate discussion and gather requirements, 
> > but nevertheless I was wondering where we take it from here: are we in a 
> > position where we start consolidating proposals, and perhaps even put 
> > out some recommendations for implementors to follow? If so, is there a 
> > particular way I can help move that forward (of course, I have biases on 
> > which items I find more important, so I'm asking at least partly out of 
> > self-interest :)).
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Jeen
> 
>