- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 21:53:34 +0100
- To: public-sparql-12@w3.org
Good question! There are a lot of good suggestions, many with consensus on an approach. The suggestion for moving forward is SEP's [1] to move those from discussion to design documents. Is there a different way to proceed, instead or or as well as? Of course, everyone is busy. Maybe we need to have meetings in order to bring what time people can find to focus on a one/a few items at a time. Andy [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sparql-12/2019Oct/0000.html On 30/07/2020 23:56, Jeen Broekstra wrote: > Hi folks, > > I was just wondering where we are at as a community group, at the > moment, and how we intend to proceed. We seem to have a fairly solid > collection of proposals for improvements and extensions, and a lot of > input from different stakeholders, which is great! > > I realize the purpose of this group is not to come up with a new > standard but rather to facilitate discussion and gather requirements, > but nevertheless I was wondering where we take it from here: are we in a > position where we start consolidating proposals, and perhaps even put > out some recommendations for implementors to follow? If so, is there a > particular way I can help move that forward (of course, I have biases on > which items I find more important, so I'm asking at least partly out of > self-interest :)). > > Cheers, > > Jeen
Received on Monday, 3 August 2020 20:53:54 UTC