Re: Solid CG work Items ∩ LWS WG charter deliverables

On 2025-02-05 22:02, elf Pavlik wrote:
> On 2025-02-05 12:47, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
>> https://github.com/solid/specification/ 
>> pull/711#pullrequestreview-2596677689
> 
> Given that LWS hasn't published an FPWD

Irrelevant.

Both because it's neither impossible nor forbidden to raise an issue in 
w3c/lws-protocol, and as I've stated in the PR regarding what's "out of 
scope" per the Solid CG charter:

 >Community Group’s Work Items that have transitioned to a deliverable 
of an active Working Group.a

For all intents and purposes, the Solid Protocol has transitioned. It's 
as close as it gets, as it is listed as an input document under the 
Deliverables section of the LWS WG charter. I don't think anyone has 
interpreted that as rubber-stamping the Solid Protocol or accepting it 
as is.

> This very specific change could not be proposed there.

I'm not aware of barriers to create an issue in w3c/lws-protocol (for 
starters) or posting on the mailing list or... Main point: there is a 
difference between a change proposal and actually updating the spec.

> Please also note during today's meeting we signaled that LWS WG needs to 
> be notified about this PR: https://github.com/solid/specification/ 
> pull/710/ 
> files#diff-657fdb8484f4c1f5e66eac906ae818492a83e5695849c68f96eb5b9e4d08389cR112

That does not mention the LWS WG at all. It only mentions a possible N3 WG.



Here is a proposal clarifying a mutual understanding between LWS WG and 
Solid CG:

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lws-wg/2025Feb/0000.html

-Sarven
https://csarven.ca/#i

Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2025 22:40:42 UTC