- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:26:47 +0100
- To: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>, public-solid@w3.org
Hi Sarven, all, I didn't attend this week's CG meeting, but we had a related discussion on the week before. More below On 20/01/2025 20:51, Sarven Capadisli wrote: > Hi all, > > I've noticed some activity on WAC - which is great - but I wanted to > check before diving further. > > Has the Solid CG recently decided to continue working on (some or all) > items that are also part of the LWS WG charter deliverables? What I said last week is that WAC is not, formally, a spec adopted by the LWS WG. The WG charter says: "Depending on the Working Group progress, including consideration for adequate implementation experience, the Group may also decide to adopt the following dependencies as input documents: [a list of specs, that includes WAC]". There has been no WG decision so far to adopt WAC, so I would not consider it to be out of scope for the CG. > I would appreciate any references to the CG decision and updates to > the charter reflecting this. > > -Sarven > https://csarven.ca/#i
Received on Friday, 7 February 2025 09:26:49 UTC