- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:31:51 +0100
- To: public-solid@w3.org
On 2024-03-25 13:38, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > I would like to see coverage reports, what parts of the spec are covered and > what are not covered, I would like to see linked a full test report where each > test is explained for every server. That would be actually transparent. > > And I note that we did have this more or less implemented for the protocol > spec. Coverage wasn't great, and things were so much in flux back then that it > was too early to publish full reports, but the functionality was more or less > there. Indeed! https://solidproject.org/ED/qa is WIP. Still eating our own cooking because anything less would be uncivilised. Who needs referees when you have a screencast (20 seconds, 4.5MB): https://dokie.li/media/video/dokieli-spec-conformance.webm showing specification requirements, test coverage, version diff, and change log based on: * https://solidproject.org/ED/protocol * https://solidproject.org/TR/2022/protocol-20221231 * https://solid-contrib.github.io/specification-tests/coverage (for the purpose of this demo). And a graph view for fun and profit. -Sarven https://csarven.ca/#i
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2024 10:31:58 UTC