Re: Reviewing solid formal objection (9) -- broadening the scope of the group

st 11. 10. 2023 v 17:49 odesílatel Matthias Evering <me@evering.eu> napsal:

> Dear all.
>
> my technical english, my experience, my CV and my DEIT-background seem to
> be too much to handle.
> I don't wanna stand in the way.
>
> I cannot lead meetings.
> I have two servers but am content to run them privately.
>
> I have a stressful life with mental issues (I don't wanna hide behind that)
> but it just seems to be too much to handle for me.
>
> Admittedly it was a roller coaster the last days but my self esteem as
> well as my lacking practicing code as junior doesn't allow it.
>
> I am content to live a life as psychonaut.
> I step back.
>
> sorry. I still maintain the sites and keep them actual and participate in
> the chat.
> sorry again. no offensive language in this text, do I see that right ?
>

Hi Matthias

No need to apologize.  You are an important and much loved member of the
community.

First, let me say that this post here was nothing to do with you, it was in
response to today's meeting where there was feedback on the Solid WG
charter, see ( https://hackmd.io/GR3lSqD0RS6_r986wK9Hug )

Just trying to understand what issue you have.

You have a lot of support if you want to try and chair the group.  If you
find you dont like it or it doesnt work out, you can always step back.
It's completely your choice.

It's a blessing for us that someone would volunteer their time and energy
to help the group.  We should be thankful for that, not increase friction
with procedures, tasks, questionnaires, letters and other bureaucracy.  I
understand that is hard and stressful.  Especially in a 2nd language,
having lived in 3 european countries, I know how hard it can be, especially
with technical language.

You've always supported this community, and hopefully we can do the same.

Best
Melvin

>
>
> @ewingson
>
> Am 11.10.2023, 17:27 Uhr, schrieb Melvin Carvalho
> <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>:
>
> > Reviewing the formal objections to the solid charter I was trying to
> > understand this one better.
> >
> > In particular, I didnt fully parse what "all ideas proposing solutions"
> > means in the context beneath
> >
> > text:
> >
> > "broaden the scope of the group, do not restrict the solution space (9,
> > FO)
> >
> > PAC: it would be better if the group address the problem and bring to the
> > table all ideas proposing the solutions."
> >
> > Would be great if anyone can shed some light on this
> >
> > https://hackmd.io/GR3lSqD0RS6_r986wK9Hug
>
>
> --
> Matthias Evering (@ewingson)
> https://meisdata.io/
>
>