Re: Social Web Protocols update

Great job, Amy!
I have a few "language" edits to suggest, per the attachments. I'm sending both the Open Office version, in case you have OO, and a PDF export, both which show the suggested changes. On the PDF file, please note the small page-like icons, which indicate where I've inserted a comment.
Please feel free to accept or reject any of these suggestions; there may well be nuances that I don't perceive.
I hope this is helpful -- Ann
 

    On Thursday, May 26, 2016 9:48 PM, Amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk> wrote:
 

 Hi everyone,
I've (finally) done a major overhaul of Social Web Protocols. As the WG is producing multiple specs which in some cases overlap functionality, this document explains how to map your requirements to the right spec. Specs are compared side by side, broken up by the functions they perform. There's also a summary table at the top.
There are still some very-draft or unfinished sections for areas that came through the use cases / requirements gathering but which haven't been addressed in depth by the WG yet. Hopefully we'll get to talk about some of these at the face-to-face.
I'd appreciate it if you can read it through, as I'd like to agree to update the WD during the next call on Tuesday.
As ever, if I've missed something or made glaring errors or minor typos, issues and PRs are welcome. I particularly welcome input from the editors of the specs discussed, as you're the most likely to spot if I've misunderstood something :)
Thanks!
Amy