Re: Social Web Protocols update

Cheers Ann! I really appreciate you taking the time to read this through.

Amy

On 30 May 2016 at 17:56, Ann Bassetti <ann.bassetti@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Great job, Amy!
>
> I have a few "language" edits to suggest, per the attachments. I'm sending
> both the Open Office version, in case you have OO, and a PDF export, both
> which show the suggested changes. On the PDF file, please note the small
> page-like icons, which indicate where I've inserted a comment.
>
> Please feel free to accept or reject any of these suggestions; there may
> well be nuances that I don't perceive.
>
> I hope this is helpful -- Ann
>
>
> On Thursday, May 26, 2016 9:48 PM, Amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've (finally) done a major overhaul of Social Web Protocols
> <http://w3c-social.github.io/social-web-protocols/>. As the WG is
> producing multiple specs which in some cases overlap functionality, this
> document explains how to map your requirements to the right spec. Specs are
> compared side by side, broken up by the functions they perform. There's
> also a summary table at the top.
>
> There are still some very-draft or unfinished sections for areas that came
> through the use cases / requirements gathering but which haven't been
> addressed in depth by the WG yet. Hopefully we'll get to talk about some of
> these at the face-to-face.
>
> I'd appreciate it if you can read it through, as I'd like to agree to
> update the WD during the next call on Tuesday.
>
> As ever, if I've missed something or made glaring errors or minor typos,
> issues and PRs are welcome. I particularly welcome input from the editors
> of the specs discussed, as you're the most likely to spot if I've
> misunderstood something :)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Amy
>
>
>