- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:27:16 -0700
- To: Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Hmm... I'd be far more inclined just to keep the existing language map mechanism. It's unfortunate that JSON-LD does not provide an easier way of establishing the document's default language without reliance on the @context On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me> wrote: > The most pertinent piece is the Language section. > Based on that I would say that the <property>Map, etc is the wrong way to go. > There is actually nothing that says about giving multiple languages at > the same time to any piece of data, just that you label and can > request certain languages. > > for example something like this.. > { > ... > "@lang": "en", > displayName: { > "@lang": "jp", > "text": "nihongo de posuto" > } > "content": "I made the title in japanese!" > .... > } > It would also effect the API in that there should be an option to > submit a preference of language, > though there really is no requirement to actually respond in the > preferred language. > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: >> There's finally a first draft of W3C expertise on how to design technologies >> which are suitably international >> >> http://www.w3.org/International/techniques/developing-specs-dynamic >> >> It would be splendid for someone to go through this thinking of AS2. >> >> -- Sandro >> >
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2015 14:28:04 UTC