- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 05:08:33 +0200
- To: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>
- Cc: Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLksqgycmfqxL0uAzVS6Op1JgmePBdn0o32_uEV1vxMcw@mail.gmail.com>
On 7 October 2015 at 04:01, Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> wrote: > Melvin, I don't know if you actually read any of the discussion around the > post-type-discovery proposal, but the -1 votes were not actually downvoting > the algorithm's existence, they were -1s because they had clarifying > questions. Since this was brought up within minutes of the end of the call, > I'm not surprised to see the -1s. Anyway, there is now another week to > review the document and we will discuss it on next week's call. I encourage > you to join the call if you have an opinion on this. > Thanks for the clarification, Aaron. I dont have a problem with the algorithm's existence. Im sure it could be useful. It's just not REC track. This problem is already solved via inferencing. IMHO not a good use of time discussing whether or not to reinvent the wheel. Just use existing RECs. > > ---- > Aaron Parecki > aaronparecki.com > @aaronpk <http://twitter.com/aaronpk> > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On 6 October 2015 at 21:22, Amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, minutes from today's call: >>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-10-06-minutes >>> >>> Main points of interest include... >>> - New draft of AS2.0 is published, see >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/ and >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/ >>> - We'll be making time to discuss Tantek's post-type-discovery proposal >>> (see http://www.w3.org/Social/track/actions/35) next week, so be sure >>> to read up on that and join the call if you have input. >>> >> >> Thanks for sharing this, Amy. >> >> -1 on tantek's inferencing algorithm (in support for elf and evan) >> >> The W3C has already innovated in this area in terms of inferencing. It's >> not a good use of WG time to discuss reinventing the wheel and possibly >> have two competing versions. >> >> >>> >>> Amy >>> >>> On 5 October 2015 at 11:51, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The agenda is now available: >>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-10-06 >>>> >>>> Nothing really special but, please, go ahead and indicate your expected >>>> participation at the F2F: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-12-01 >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> -- >>>> Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies >>>> - IBM Software Group >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2015 03:09:03 UTC