Re: Social Web WG Agenda for 6 October 2015

Melvin, I don't know if you actually read any of the discussion around the
post-type-discovery proposal, but the -1 votes were not actually downvoting
the algorithm's existence, they were -1s because they had clarifying
questions. Since this was brought up within minutes of the end of the call,
I'm not surprised to see the -1s. Anyway, there is now another week to
review the document and we will discuss it on next week's call. I encourage
you to join the call if you have an opinion on this.

----
Aaron Parecki
aaronparecki.com
@aaronpk <http://twitter.com/aaronpk>


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 6 October 2015 at 21:22, Amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi all, minutes from today's call:
>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-10-06-minutes
>>
>> Main points of interest include...
>> - New draft of AS2.0 is published, see
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/ and
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/
>> - We'll be making time to discuss Tantek's post-type-discovery proposal
>> (see http://www.w3.org/Social/track/actions/35) next week, so be sure to
>> read up on that and join the call if you have input.
>>
>
> Thanks for sharing this, Amy.
>
> -1 on tantek's inferencing algorithm (in support for elf and evan)
>
> The W3C has already innovated in this area in terms of inferencing.  It's
> not a good use of WG time to discuss reinventing the wheel and possibly
> have two competing versions.
>
>
>>
>> Amy
>>
>> On 5 October 2015 at 11:51, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The agenda is now available: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-10-06
>>>
>>> Nothing really special but, please, go ahead and indicate your expected
>>> participation at the F2F: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-12-01
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> --
>>> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies -
>>> IBM Software Group
>>>
>>>
>>
>