Re: today's meeting cancelled

Actually, could the chairs also keep the main page's "Next Meeting"
and "Future Meetings" sections up to date.
(http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg)
They have been continually falling behind as well. and is now over 2
weeks out of date.
We used to have like 3 weeks out listed there.

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me> wrote:
> Honestly I think the wiki page should be created with a stub for the
> agenda immediately after the previous meeting (if not long before
> that) so people have a place to go to look at
> proposed agenda items or to add new ones.
> Looking at wiki history they are generally thrown together the day
> before the meeting.
> The FIFO format at least leaves us a place to find those items.
>
> Last meeting the previous weeks items weren't added until during the
> meeting.  We obviously haven't adjusted to it yet.
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> benjamin.a.roberts83@gmail.com wrote on 11/20/2015 04:25:40 AM:
>>
>>> From: Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me>
>>> To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
>>> Cc: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>, Sandro
>>> Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>>> Date: 11/20/2015 04:25 AM
>>> Subject: Re: today's meeting cancelled
>>> Sent by: benjamin.a.roberts83@gmail.com
>>>
>>> The problem with the left over from the last week was that they all
>>> had to do with AS2 and we didn't have either editor going to be on the
>>> call. So those items were all not really discussable.
>>
>> There was at least Aaron's agenda item that has been pushed back two weeks
>> already that should have been put on the agenda.
>> And while this may not have been enough to warrant holding a call it is
>> independent of the fact that people shouldn't have been left wondering
>> without any agenda to look at.
>> --
>> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM
>> Software Group
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> > I apologize for the confusion that led to the cancellation of this
>>> > week's
>>> > call. Evan and I weren't available this week.
>>> >
>>> > While it is nice when WG members help set up the agenda, ultimately it
>>> > is
>>> > the chair's responsibility to ensure the agenda is set before the call,
>>> > with
>>> > as much as possible enough lead time for people to prepare. Tantek
>>> > apparently said there wasn't anything to talk about but he evidently
>>> > failed
>>> > to take into account the agenda items left over from last week and that
>>> > should have been carried over to this week's agenda. This has always
>>> > been
>>> > the case but it is even more true with the FIFO agenda model we've
>>> > adopted.
>>> >
>>> > The chairs and team will have to discuss this and see that it doesn't
>>> > happen
>>> > again.
>>> > --
>>> > Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies -
>>> > IBM
>>> > Software Group
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote on 11/17/2015 09:24:32
>>> > AM:
>>> >
>>> >> From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>>> >> To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
>>> >> Cc: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
>>> >> Date: 11/17/2015 09:24 AM
>>> >> Subject: Re: today's meeting cancelled
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> On 17 November 2015 at 18:10, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>>> >> many regrets, and no agenda items proposed
>>> >>
>>> >> <tantek> greetings #social - since no one has added anything to the
>>> >> agenda for today, and I am your chair today, I am cancelling the
>>> >> telcon.
>>> >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-11-17
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> FYI: for future reference
>>> >>
>>> >> <tantek> making a point, if no one thought anything in particular
>>> >> was important enough to put on the agenda, then better if we cancel
>>> >> and give people the time back
>>> >> <tantek> sandro - no - if no one brings up a specific issue as being
>>> >> worthy of synchronous time - then it is better NOT to waste
>>> >> everyone's synchronous time with boring issue iteration
>>> >> <tantek> please continue asynchronously everyone. thank you!
>>>
>>

Received on Friday, 20 November 2015 18:21:30 UTC