- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:53:38 -0800
- To: Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me>
- Cc: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <201511202053.tAKKrmrP019857@d03av04.boulder.ibm.com>
benjamin.a.roberts83@gmail.com wrote on 11/20/2015 10:20:59 AM: > From: Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me> > To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org> > Date: 11/20/2015 10:21 AM > Subject: Re: today's meeting cancelled > Sent by: benjamin.a.roberts83@gmail.com > > Actually, could the chairs also keep the main page's "Next Meeting" > and "Future Meetings" sections up to date. > (http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg) > They have been continually falling behind as well. and is now over 2 > weeks out of date. > We used to have like 3 weeks out listed there. To my defense, you can see who's the last one to have done so. But you're right. The chairs should keep this up-to-date. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM Software Group > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me> wrote: > > Honestly I think the wiki page should be created with a stub for the > > agenda immediately after the previous meeting (if not long before > > that) so people have a place to go to look at > > proposed agenda items or to add new ones. > > Looking at wiki history they are generally thrown together the day > > before the meeting. > > The FIFO format at least leaves us a place to find those items. > > > > Last meeting the previous weeks items weren't added until during the > > meeting. We obviously haven't adjusted to it yet. > > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: > >> benjamin.a.roberts83@gmail.com wrote on 11/20/2015 04:25:40 AM: > >> > >>> From: Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me> > >>> To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS > >>> Cc: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>, Sandro > >>> Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > >>> Date: 11/20/2015 04:25 AM > >>> Subject: Re: today's meeting cancelled > >>> Sent by: benjamin.a.roberts83@gmail.com > >>> > >>> The problem with the left over from the last week was that they all > >>> had to do with AS2 and we didn't have either editor going to be on the > >>> call. So those items were all not really discussable. > >> > >> There was at least Aaron's agenda item that has been pushed back two weeks > >> already that should have been put on the agenda. > >> And while this may not have been enough to warrant holding a call it is > >> independent of the fact that people shouldn't have been left wondering > >> without any agenda to look at. > >> -- > >> Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web > Technologies - IBM > >> Software Group > >> > >> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Hi all, > >>> > I apologize for the confusion that led to the cancellation of this > >>> > week's > >>> > call. Evan and I weren't available this week. > >>> > > >>> > While it is nice when WG members help set up the agenda, ultimately it > >>> > is > >>> > the chair's responsibility to ensure the agenda is set before the call, > >>> > with > >>> > as much as possible enough lead time for people to prepare. Tantek > >>> > apparently said there wasn't anything to talk about but he evidently > >>> > failed > >>> > to take into account the agenda items left over from last week and that > >>> > should have been carried over to this week's agenda. This has always > >>> > been > >>> > the case but it is even more true with the FIFO agenda model we've > >>> > adopted. > >>> > > >>> > The chairs and team will have to discuss this and see that it doesn't > >>> > happen > >>> > again. > >>> > -- > >>> > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - > >>> > IBM > >>> > Software Group > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote on 11/17/2015 09:24:32 > >>> > AM: > >>> > > >>> >> From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > >>> >> To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> > >>> >> Cc: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org> > >>> >> Date: 11/17/2015 09:24 AM > >>> >> Subject: Re: today's meeting cancelled > >>> > > >>> >> > >>> >> On 17 November 2015 at 18:10, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > >>> >> many regrets, and no agenda items proposed > >>> >> > >>> >> <tantek> greetings #social - since no one has added anything to the > >>> >> agenda for today, and I am your chair today, I am cancelling the > >>> >> telcon. > >>> >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-11-17 > >>> > > >>> >> > >>> >> FYI: for future reference > >>> >> > >>> >> <tantek> making a point, if no one thought anything in particular > >>> >> was important enough to put on the agenda, then better if we cancel > >>> >> and give people the time back > >>> >> <tantek> sandro - no - if no one brings up a specific issue as being > >>> >> worthy of synchronous time - then it is better NOT to waste > >>> >> everyone's synchronous time with boring issue iteration > >>> >> <tantek> please continue asynchronously everyone. thank you! > >>> > >> >
Received on Friday, 20 November 2015 20:54:30 UTC